Start Your Claim Today

Send us your details, and one of our experts will be in touch.

Successfull form submission tick

Thanks for your details!

One of our legal specialists will review your details and call you back within 24 hours to discuss this further.

Alternatively to speak to a specialist
for FREE call us now on

Successfull form submission tick

Thanks for your feedback!

We take all of our feedback seriously so we can learn what we're doing right, wrong and how we can improve.

If you would like to speak to us regarding your feedback please email us at

Firm Fined after Worker Suffers Chemical Burns

A Hampshire based electropolishing firm has been prosecuted following an incident in which an employee suffered chemical burns.

On 13 February 2015, Keith Brown, an employee of Poligrat (UK) Limited, was working at their Aldershot site when he was instructed by his manager to dispose of waste cleaning chemicals. The agreed method to carry out this task was to pour caustic pearl granules into an ‘intermediate bulk container’ (IBC) filled with acid, neutralising the chemicals inside.

Once Mr Brown started to pour the caustic pearl granules into the container, an exothermic reaction took place and the contents of the container erupted over him. Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court heard how Mr Brown was knocked to the ground by the explosion and his glasses were blown off. As a result, the 51 year old suffered ulcers to both corneas and alkaline burns to his eyelids, as well as burns and grazing to both legs.

Following an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) into the incident, it was found that the substances and activity used in the process were not adequately risk assessed.

After pleading guilty to Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and Regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, Poligrat (UK) Limited, of Waverley Lane, Farnham, Surrey, was fined £8,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1,072.

HSE inspector Andrew Johnson said after the hearing:

“The use of an IBC as a reaction vessel was wholly inappropriate. IBC’s are designed for the storage of a range of substances. They are not designed for use as a chemical reactor. Other safer reasonably practicable options were available, such as using a waste management company to remove and safely dispose of the chemicals.”

Accident at work – expert advice

If you have been injured in the workplace you could be entitled to personal injury compensation. Remember, we offer you a FREE no-obligation consultation – discover today whether you have a claim. Speak to one of our professional and friendly advisers today on 0800 888 6 888 or email .

Source: Health & Safety Executive

Free Advice

We offer a free legal consultation
to every potential client

No Win No Fee

Many of our claims are offered on
No Win No Fee payment terms

Use our App

Our Free App allows you to
manage your compensation claim

Landscape TrustPilot Widget Mobile Landscape TrustPilot Widget


of our clients were
completely satisfied


of our clients would
use us again


of our clients would
recommend our services


in compensation
recovered for our clients

Screenshot of the Claim Test used to check if you have a claim

Find out how much you can claim with our compensation calculator

It's really quick and easy, find out in 30 seconds.

See what you're owed!
Call us FREE on

or request a call back