Start Your Claim Today

Send us your details, and one of our experts will be in touch.

Successfull form submission tick

Thanks for your details!

One of our legal specialists will review your details and call you back within 24 hours to discuss this further.

Alternatively to speak to a specialist
for FREE call us now on

Successfull form submission tick

Thanks for your feedback!

We take all of our feedback seriously so we can learn what we're doing right, wrong and how we can improve.

If you would like to speak to us regarding your feedback please email us at

Worker’s severed fingers lands firm in court

A manufacturing firm in Rotherham has been fined after one of its employee’s fingers were crushed and severed in an unguarded machine.

What happened?

The 43-year-old employee was asked to work on a machine which presses lead work-pieces into required shapes at metal manufacturers, Heaps, Arnold and Heaps Ltd.

He was unaware, however, that a vital safety device had been deliberately removed from a 250-tonne press while he was away on annual leave.

Therefore, during a routine cleaning operation, he put his hand into the machine. The press then activated without warning, leaving his fingers badly crushed.

His index and middle fingers were severed, and he sustained further crush injuries to his left hand.

An investigation into the incident found that the safety mechanism had been removed deliberately so the machine could be used even when the protective guard was open.

Additionally, the investigation found that the adequate management systems had not been put in place to ensure safety relating to the required machinery guarding standards.

What was the outcome?

Heaps, Arnold and Heaps Ltd admitted to breaching the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations, and was fined £8,000 and ordered to pay £687 in costs.

HSE Inspector, Jane Fox, said:

“This serious injury was entirely preventable. A safety device had been
deliberately taken off with the full knowledge of management.

“There were no systems in place to check the safety of machines and this
employee was certainly not told that the machine had been
left in a dangerous condition.

“Safety devices, such as guards and interlocks, are installed on machines for
very good reason – and that is to prevent workers from coming into contact
inadvertently with dangerous moving parts. Regulations and safety
standards have been in place for many years on this issue and
are well-recognised by the majority of companies.

“Sadly, this was not the case here and an employee of long-standing now
has to endure the consequences for the rest of his life.”

If you have been affected by an accident at work, and you would like expert advice, contact Hampson Hughes Solicitors today on 0800 888 6888 or email

Source: View article

Free Advice

We offer a free legal consultation
to every potential client

No Win No Fee

Many of our claims are offered on
No Win No Fee payment terms

Use our App

Our Free App allows you to
manage your compensation claim

Landscape TrustPilot Widget Mobile Landscape TrustPilot Widget

9/10

of our clients were
completely satisfied

9/10

of our clients would
use us again

9/10

of our clients would
recommend our services

65M

in compensation
recovered for our clients

Screenshot of the Claim Test used to check if you have a claim

Find out how much you can claim with our compensation calculator

It's really quick and easy, find out in 30 seconds.

See what you're owed!
Call us FREE on

or request a call back