Start Your Claim Today

Send us your details, and one of our experts will be in touch.

Successfull form submission tick

Thanks for your details!

One of our legal specialists will review your details and call you back within 24 hours to discuss this further.

Alternatively to speak to a specialist
for FREE call us now on

Successfull form submission tick

Thanks for your feedback!

We take all of our feedback seriously so we can learn what we're doing right, wrong and how we can improve.

If you would like to speak to us regarding your feedback please email us at

Machining Company – Accident at Work

A worker has been injured at work in Dorset following an incident with unguarded machinery.

What Happened?

In a prosecution brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Bournemouth Magistrates’ Court heard that the male employee (who does not wish to be named) had mistakenly set the machinery to operate a greater rate of revolutions than was necessary.

As a result, metal objects were ejected at high speed through the unguarded door of the lathe. These objects struck the worker and caused severe bruising – the man was unable to return to work for several weeks.

What was the Outcome?

HSE was able to establish that had the guards been in place, the speed of the machine would have been limited – meaning that the incident would have been less likely to occur.

HSE also found that safeguards had been disabled on three other machines in the factory. The company was served with Prohibition Notices (ceasing the use of the unguarded machinery with immediate effect) and an Improvement Notice (relating to monitoring safety guards)

TG Engineering Ltd, of Sterling Business Park, Ferndown Industrial Estate, Dorset, was found guilty of breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

The company was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay costs of £8,369

HSE inspector Matthew Tyler commented:

“Using the interlocking guards provided with the machine would have prevented access to
dangerous parts and reduced the risk of ejection of materials and entanglement.

“The disabling of interlocks is a common failure in engineering companies
and this prosecution should serve as a reminder to the risks involved.”

If you have been affected by an accident at work, and you would like expert advice on this type of case, contact Hampson Hughes Solicitors today on 0800 888 6888 or email

Source: View Article

Free Advice

We offer a free legal consultation
to every potential client

No Win No Fee

Many of our claims are offered on
No Win No Fee payment terms

Use our App

Our Free App allows you to
manage your compensation claim

Landscape TrustPilot Widget Mobile Landscape TrustPilot Widget

9/10

of our clients were
completely satisfied

9/10

of our clients would
use us again

9/10

of our clients would
recommend our services

65M

in compensation
recovered for our clients

Screenshot of the Claim Test used to check if you have a claim

Find out how much you can claim with our compensation calculator

It's really quick and easy, find out in 30 seconds.

See what you're owed!
Call us FREE on

or request a call back